What you thought was one concept is two nested concepts
https://gyazo.com/9e9180104e1cecccfaed3c2b1e92b294
We were talking about a concept, calling it A.
But it doesn't come across well.
After digging into why, I discovered that there are two concepts called A
Hereinafter referred to as A1 and A2.
These two are in implication in event space.
in other words
A1 then A2
A2 but not necessarily A1
If you do not pay attention to this "A2 but not A1" event, or if it is very rare, A1 and A2 appear to be the same thing
As a result, one word, A, calls them both
This is a state where the boundary of the concept of A is blurred as shown in the lower left figure.
Humans can manipulate symbols without realizing that the boundaries are blurred concepts.
Often overlooked unless one is trained to clarify boundaries.
relevance
Blurred Boundaries
Unclear dichotomy
Unclear concept
The usefulness of defining the boundaries of a concept
This is about whether it is useful to clarify Conceptual Boundaries or not, depending on the situation.
Boundary blurring
This is a lot about organization.
In Relation Question, you're asking about the relationship between two concepts, but there are cases where two concepts are classified with in the first place.
Cognitive Resolution
One-dimensional version of cognitive resolution
In Resolution Stage, you had the lowest resolution state as dichotomy, but there's even more "identical."
What you thought was one concept is two concepts
A set that was assumed to be equal
narrow sense and broad sense
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/一つの概念だと思っていたものが入れ子の二つの概念 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.